Crypto Industry Doubles Down on Michigan House Race with $2M Campaign Blitz
Fairshake-affiliated PAC escalates spending in Democratic primary as next week's vote tests crypto lobby's influence in 2026 midterms
By Jane Doe
Published on Aug 1, 2026
Quick Take
- Protect Progress PAC has spent over $2 million supporting Rep. Shri Thanedar and opposing challenger Donavan McKinney in Michigan's 13th district Democratic primary
- New filings show the PAC doubled its investment in one week, adding $884,240 for Thanedar and $150,000+ against McKinney
- Thanedar voted for GENIUS Act and crypto market structure legislation; McKinney accuses him of backing Trump's crypto profiteering
- The spending is part of Fairshake's broader $193 million war chest targeting 2026 races across multiple states
What Happened
The cryptocurrency industry's campaign to shape Congress just intensified significantly in Michigan. According to Federal Election Commission filings released Thursday, Protect Progress PAC—an affiliate of the crypto-funded Fairshake super PAC—has now committed more than $2 million to influence the Democratic primary in Michigan's 13th Congressional District.
The spending targets next Tuesday's primary contest between incumbent Representative Shri Thanedar and Democratic challenger Donavan McKinney. In just one week, the PAC effectively doubled its investment: new filings show an additional $884,240 spent on advertisements supporting Thanedar, plus more than $150,000 on media opposing McKinney.
Protect Progress draws its funding primarily from major cryptocurrency companies Ripple Labs and Coinbase, which have made the 2026 midterm elections a priority battleground for industry-friendly policy advancement.
Why It Matters
Context: The Michigan race serves as an early test case for crypto industry political strategy in 2026. Unlike 2024's focus on open seats and swing districts, Fairshake and its affiliates are now willing to intervene in Democratic primaries to reward incumbents who voted for industry priorities—even when facing challenges from within their own party.
This escalation marks a strategic shift for crypto political action committees. Rather than simply backing crypto-friendly candidates in general elections, the industry is now investing heavily to protect Democratic incumbents who supported key legislation—sending a clear signal about the value of voting with industry priorities.
The timing matters politically: Michigan's primary falls on the same day as Washington state's, with Alabama following days later on August 11. Fairshake affiliates are active in all three states, creating a coordinated pressure campaign as Congress continues debating crypto regulatory frameworks.
For the broader Democratic Party, the race raises questions about industry influence. McKinney's campaign has framed the contest as a referendum on corporate money in politics, specifically linking Thanedar's crypto votes to what McKinney characterizes as enabling President Trump's personal crypto profits.
The Numbers
Thanedar's Crypto Voting Record
Representative Thanedar's support for cryptocurrency legislation has been consistent across multiple bills currently moving through Congress:
| Legislation | Thanedar Position | Status |
|---|---|---|
| GENIUS Act (stablecoin regulation) | Voted in favor | Under Senate consideration |
| CLARITY Act (market structure) | Voted in favor | Under Senate consideration |
| Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act | Co-sponsored | Active legislation |
The Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act specifically aims to establish legal protections for software developers working on decentralized protocols—a priority for the industry following enforcement actions that targeted developers alongside companies.
The Political Battle Lines
Challenger Donavan McKinney has built his campaign messaging around opposition to what he characterizes as crypto industry influence over Democratic politics. In a July 21 statement, McKinney directly linked Thanedar's legislative record to President Trump's personal financial gains.
"The crypto lobby is paying my opponent back for helping Trump make over $1 billion since taking office," McKinney said, referencing the President's disclosure that he earned more than $1.4 billion from crypto investments in 2025.
Background: Trump's Crypto Holdings
According to presidential financial disclosures, President Trump reported cryptocurrency-related earnings exceeding $1.4 billion in 2025. The sources included returns from his TRUMP memecoin and business interests through World Liberty Financial, a family venture. Democratic critics have argued that legislation like the GENIUS Act—which Thanedar supported—creates favorable regulatory conditions that benefit Trump's personal financial position, constituting a conflict of interest.
Neither the Thanedar campaign nor the McKinney campaign responded to Cointelegraph's requests for comment on the PAC spending by publication time.
Fairshake's Broader 2026 Campaign
The Michigan spending is one component of a multi-state offensive by Fairshake and its affiliate PACs heading into the 2026 midterms. The super PAC established itself as a major force in 2024, deploying more than $170 million across races nationwide to support candidates favorable to crypto industry policy goals.
As of January 2026, Fairshake reported holding a $193 million war chest—providing substantial resources to influence dozens of competitive races through November.
Current 2026 Primary Targets
Washington State (August 5 primary): The Defend American Jobs PAC, another Fairshake affiliate, spent more than $65,000 on media supporting a Republican candidate in the state's 4th congressional district, according to FEC filings. Washington's primary coincides with Michigan's.
Alabama (August 11 primary): Defend American Jobs has committed more than $511,000 to media supporting Jerry Carl Jr., a Republican who previously represented Alabama's 1st congressional district from 2021 to 2025. Carl was among the wealthiest members of Alabama's House delegation during his tenure, with a reported net worth reaching up to $15 million as of 2023.
Texas and Illinois: The source material confirms Fairshake affiliates have poured millions into races in both states, though specific spending figures were not detailed in the FEC filings referenced.
Industry Funding Sources
Consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen tracked crypto industry political spending and reported in June that Fairshake and its affiliates accounted for more than $82 million of the approximately $189 million cryptocurrency companies had deployed in the 2026 election cycle to that point.
The bulk of Fairshake funding originates from contributions by Ripple Labs and Coinbase, two of the largest cryptocurrency companies in the United States. Both firms face ongoing regulatory scrutiny and have identified favorable Congressional composition as critical to their business interests.
What's Next
Tuesday, August 5: Michigan and Washington primaries will provide the first results showing whether Fairshake's investment strategy successfully protects incumbent allies in competitive Democratic primaries.
Monday, August 11: Alabama holds its primary elections, with Fairshake affiliate support behind Jerry Carl Jr.'s comeback attempt.
Legislative Calendar: Both the GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act remain under consideration in the Senate. Outcomes in these primaries may influence undecided Senators' calculus on both bills, particularly Democrats weighing industry support against constituent concerns about crypto regulation.
November 2026: General elections will determine whether Fairshake's spending translated to a Congress more favorable to cryptocurrency industry priorities. The super PAC's ability to protect allies in primaries may determine how many incumbents feel secure voting for industry-backed legislation in the next session.
Frequently Asked Questions
A: Protect Progress PAC is an affiliate organization of Fairshake, a super PAC funded primarily by cryptocurrency companies Ripple Labs and Coinbase. While legally separate entities, affiliate PACs like Protect Progress coordinate strategy and share funding sources with the parent organization. Fairshake reported holding $193 million as of January 2026 and spent over $170 million in the 2024 election cycle.
A: Representative Shri Thanedar voted in favor of the GENIUS Act (focused on stablecoin regulation) and the CLARITY Act (crypto market structure legislation), both currently under Senate consideration. He also co-sponsored the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act, which aims to establish legal protections for blockchain software developers.
A: According to Public Citizen's June report, cryptocurrency companies had spent approximately $189 million on the 2026 election cycle at that point. Fairshake and its affiliate PACs accounted for more than $82 million of that total. These figures have increased since June as additional FEC filings have been submitted.
A: Challenger Donavan McKinney has argued that Thanedar's votes for crypto legislation like the GENIUS Act helped create favorable conditions for President Trump to profit from cryptocurrency investments. Trump disclosed earning more than $1.4 billion from crypto in 2025, including from his TRUMP memecoin and World Liberty Financial. McKinney characterized the PAC spending as "the crypto lobby paying my opponent back" for supporting legislation that benefited Trump financially.
A: Beyond Michigan's August 5 primary, Fairshake affiliates have spent over $65,000 in Washington state (also voting August 5) and more than $511,000 in Alabama (primary August 11). The PACs have also invested millions in Texas and Illinois races, with specific spending continuing through the primary season.
Sources & Methodology
All spending figures, dates, and candidate positions cited in this report are derived from Federal Election Commission filings as reported in the source material, Public Citizen reporting referenced in the source, and candidate statements quoted in the original news item. No external price data, polling data, or predictive election modeling has been incorporated. Readers seeking to verify FEC expenditure data can access filings directly through the Federal Election Commission's public database.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.